What is a Lyophilized Peptide?

By: Dr. Anne Arnold

Introduction

Peptides are short chains of amino acids, usually two to fifty residues long, linked together by peptide bonds. They are larger and more complex than small molecules, yet smaller and simpler than proteins (Forbes & Krishnamurthy, 2025). This scale makes them useful in research because they can mimic stretches of protein sequence without the complexity of a full protein. Researchers rely on them to study binding sites(Amartely et al., 2014), enzyme activity (He et al., 2024), or signaling pathways (Wang et al., 2022), and they are common reagents in fields ranging from biochemistry to molecular biology and materials science (Howl, 2008).

Despite their value, peptides present a practical problem: they are unstable in water. To be studied, they must be dissolved in solution, but the same environment accelerates their breakdown. Hydrolysis (Ohtake & Shalaev, 2013; Zapadka et al., 2017), oxidation, and deamidation all erode their structure (Zapadka et al., 2017). For researchers, this instability is more than inconvenient. If peptides degrade, results can shift from one trial to another, making reproducibility difficult to achieve (Howl, 2008; Zapadka et al., 2017). Preserving peptide stability is therefore essential for reliable science. 

One of the most effective ways to stabilize peptides is through lyophilization, more commonly called freeze-drying (Kommineni et al., 2022; Samyuktha et al., 2025). This technique removes water under controlled conditions, leaving behind a dry material that retains both structure and function. Lyophilized peptides can be stored for long periods, shipped across distances, and then reconstituted when needed (Samyuktha et al., 2025), an approach that makes experiments more consistent and results easier to compare.

Why Lyophilize Peptides?

The need for lyophilization stems from the chemistry of peptides in water. In aqueous solution, several degradation pathways compromise peptide stability:

1. Hydrolysis breaks peptide bonds, fragmenting the chain. Sequences containing aspartic acid are highly prone to this. Serine can also promote hydrolysis, though less frequently (Ohtake & Shalaev, 2013).
2. Oxidation targets reactive side chains such as methionine, cysteine, and tryptophan, altering their chemical properties (Zapadka et al., 2017).
3. Deamidation converts asparagine or glutamine residues into acidic forms, which can change charge and disrupt structure (Zapadka et al., 2017).

Attempts to dry peptides with heat only make the situation worse. Elevated temperatures accelerate chemical reactions and denature delicate structures (Kommineni et al., 2022; Ohtake & Shalaev, 2013). Lyophilization avoids this problem. By freezing the peptide solution and lowering the pressure, ice can be removed by sublimation, a direct transition from solid to vapor without passing through liquid water (Samyuktha et al., 2025; Tchessalov et al., 2023). This bypass of the liquid phase minimizes hydrolytic reactions (Ohtake & Shalaev, 2013) and preserves the peptide’s integrity (Kommineni et al., 2022). 

The end product is a dry, porous solid often referred to as a lyophilized cake. When stored under the right conditions, the cake maintains stability for months or even years (Tchessalov et al., 2023). At the time of use, it can be dissolved back into water or buffer, restoring peptide functionality and supporting reproducible experiments (Kommineni et al., 2022; Samyuktha et al., 2025).

Process Overview

Lyophilization operates by exploiting the phase relationships of water. At normal atmospheric pressure, ice must first melt into liquid before it can evaporate. When the pressure is lowered below the triple point, however, water follows a different path: ice can transform directly into vapor through a process known as sublimation (Samyuktha et al., 2025; Tchessalov et al., 2023). This ability to bypass the liquid phase is the basis of freeze-drying and explains why it is so effective for preserving peptides (Samyuktha et al., 2025; Tchessalov et al., 2023). By avoiding liquid water, lyophilization minimizes hydrolytic reactions (Ohtake & Shalaev, 2013) and reduces structural damage during the drying process (Kommineni et al., 2022). 

The lyophilization process consists of three distinct stages: freezing, primary drying, and secondary drying (Kommineni et al., 2022; Samyuktha et al., 2025). Each stage serves a specific purpose, and together they determine the stability and quality of the final peptide product (Kommineni et al., 2022).

Figure 1. Steps of the lyophilization process. The process proceeds through freezing, primary drying, and secondary drying to produce a stable product. Adapted from (Arora et al., 2024).

1. Freezing

The freezing process begins by lowering the temperature of the peptide solution until ice crystals form. During freezing, water molecules arrange into solid ice, forcing dissolved solutes, including peptides and stabilizing additives, into the remaining liquid channels (Kommineni et al., 2022; Samyuktha et al., 2025). As freezing progresses, the peptides become trapped in a concentrated matrix.

Ice morphology, or the structure of the ice crystals, depends on how quickly the sample cools:

1. Slow cooling (for example, lowering the temperature by a few degrees per minute) allows large crystals to form. When these crystals are later removed by sublimation, they leave behind large pores. The resulting lyophilized cake has an open, porous structure that reconstitutes rapidly.
2. Fast cooling (such as plunging into liquid nitrogen) produces many small crystals. Smaller ice crystals leave smaller pores and a denser cake, which can dissolve more slowly when reconstituted (Tchessalov et al., 2023). 

The cooling rate must be chosen with care (Tchessalov et al., 2023). Some peptides tolerate slow freezing well, while others are sensitive to the stress of ice crystal growth and may denature. Controlled freezing systems allow researchers to adjust conditions to optimize both structure and stability. 

2. Primary Drying

After the solution has frozen solid, the pressure is dropped to create a vacuum. In this environment, the ice skips the melting step and transitions directly into vapor (sublimation). During this process, the sample cannot get too warm. If the temperature rises above what is known as the collapse temperature, the frozen structure can lose its shape and break down (Tchessalov et al., 2023).

Maintaining the temperature below the collapse point is essential. If the matrix collapses, the cake may become sticky, glassy, or structurally deformed. This reduces porosity, slows reconstitution, and can even trap moisture unevenly (Tchessalov et al., 2023). In peptide work, collapsed cakes often dissolve poorly and can complicate precise experimental dosing.

During this stage, most of the water is removed. However, a small amount of water molecules remains bound to peptides and excipients (Samyuktha et al., 2025; Tchessalov et al., 2023).

3. Secondary Drying

The final stage of lyophilization involves removing adsorbed water from the peptide. The sample is gently warmed while maintaining vacuum. During this step, water is removed through a slow desorption process, reducing the moisture content to just a few percent (Ohtake & Shalaev, 2013; Tchessalov et al., 2023). That small amount, typically 1 to 3 percent, is low enough to guard against hydrolysis yet still sufficient to maintain the structure’s stability (Ohtake & Shalaev, 2013). By the end of secondary drying, the peptide has taken on its final solid form, ready to be sealed, labeled, and stored until it is needed again.

Key Determinants of Stability

Several factors influence how well peptides withstand lyophilization:

1. Formulation Additives
   1. Sugars, such as sucrose and trehalose, protect peptides by replacing water molecules around them (Kommineni et al., 2022; Samyuktha et al., 2025), thereby preserving hydrogen bonding networks.
   2. Polyols and amino acids may also serve as stabilizers (Samyuktha et al., 2025).
   3. Mannitol is sometimes used to provide bulk and improve cake structure (Samyuktha et al., 2025).

2. Freezing Profile

1. Cooling rate influences pore size and surface area (Samyuktha et al., 2025; Tchessalov et al., 2023).
2. An optimized profile strikes a balance between reconstitution speed and structural stability (Tchessalov et al., 2023).
3. Vacuum Conditions
4. Pressure must remain low enough to support sublimation but not so low that drying becomes too slow or uneven (Kommineni et al., 2022).
5. Temperature Control

1. Shelf temperature must be carefully regulated (Samyuktha et al., 2025).
2. Exceeding the collapse temperature compromises cake integrity (Tchessalov et al., 2023).

Because peptides vary widely in size, sequence, and chemical behavior, each one may require different settings to achieve optimal results (Ohtake & Shalaev, 2013; Zapadka et al., 2017).

Physical Characteristics of the Lyophilized Cake

The dried product is called a cake because of its solid, porous appearance. A high-quality cake looks uniform, intact, and well-structured. Such morphology supports consistent handling and rapid reconstitution (Kommineni et al., 2022).

However, several issues can arise:

1. Collapse produces sticky or glossy material (Kommineni et al., 2022; Samyuktha et al., 2025).
2. Shrinkage suggests uneven drying (Samyuktha et al., 2025).

Process optimization, including proper use of stabilizers, helps avoid these problems. 

Figure 2. Well-formed cakes (left) are uniform and porous, while collapsed cakes (right) show structural failure and reduced stability. Adapted from (Mensch et al., 2021).

Storage and Handling

Lyophilization extends stability, but storage conditions remain important:

1. Temperature: Most peptides are stored at −20 °C, while very unstable sequences may require −80 °C (Samyuktha et al., 2025).
2. Light protection: Aromatic residues, such as tryptophan and tyrosine, can degrade under light exposure; therefore, samples are often stored in amber vials (Zapadka et al., 2017).
3. Atmosphere: Vials are sealed tightly, sometimes under an inert gas, to prevent oxygen or moisture from entering (Kommineni et al., 2022).

When properly stored, lyophilized peptides can retain their integrity for years, far longer than their solution-state counterparts (Ohtake & Shalaev, 2013; Samyuktha et al., 2025; Zapadka et al., 2017).

Reconstitution

Before use, peptides are reconstituted by adding water or buffer. The ease of reconstitution depends on:

1. Pore size from the freezing stage
2. Stabilizer composition (Samyuktha et al., 2025)
3. Intrinsic solubility of the peptide sequence (Zapadka et al., 2017)

Well-prepared cakes dissolve quickly and uniformly. Poorly optimized samples may clump, dissolve unevenly, or resist mixing (Samyuktha et al., 2025).

Applications in Research

Lyophilized peptides play a central role in laboratory science. Some common uses include:

1. Biochemistry: Peptides serve as substrates for enzymes, ligands for receptors, or scaffolds for synthetic modifications. 
2. Molecular biology: Short synthetic peptides are used in binding studies, protein-protein interaction mapping, and epitope identification. 
3. Analytical chemistry: Stable peptide standards are needed for calibration in mass spectrometry or chromatography. 
4. Materials science: Peptide-based hydrogels and nanomaterials often start from lyophilized peptide stocks (Howl, 2008).

By enabling stable storage and reproducibility, lyophilization supports consistent research outcomes across different laboratories and over extended time frames.

Comparison to Other Drying Methods

Researchers sometimes ask why lyophilization is preferred over alternatives:

1. Air drying is simple but promotes oxidation and uneven concentration gradients.
2. Spray drying can be effective for specific biomolecules, but it involves elevated temperatures that can damage sensitive peptides (Kommineni et al., 2022).
3. Vacuum oven drying removes water but does not prevent collapse or hydrolysis effectively (Samyuktha et al., 2025).

Lyophilization, although more resource-intensive, remains the method of choice because it strikes a balance between gentle processing and reliable stability (Tchessalov et al., 2023).

Practical Considerations for Researchers

When incorporating lyophilized peptides into experiments, researchers should:

1. Confirm residual moisture content, especially for quantitative work (Ohtake & Shalaev, 2013; Tchessalov et al., 2023).
2. Note stabilizers are present, as they can influence assays (Howl, 2008; Samyuktha et al., 2025).
3. Keep vials sealed until use to prevent the uptake of atmospheric moisture (Kommineni et al., 2022; Samyuktha et al., 2025).
4. Reconstitute with sterile solutions to prevent microbial contamination.

By observing these precautions, labs can maximize reproducibility and minimize waste.

Conclusion

Peptides are remarkably useful in progressing research,(Howl, 2008) but they do not stay stable for long in solution (Zapadka et al., 2017). One of the most reliable ways to protect them is through lyophilization, a process that freezes the solution, removes water by sublimation, and then carefully dries the remaining material (Kommineni et al., 2022; Samyuktha et al., 2025; Tchessalov et al., 2023).

Rather than a single step, lyophilization unfolds in three stages: freezing, primary drying, and secondary drying (Samyuktha et al., 2025; Tchessalov et al., 2023). Each phase leaves its mark on the quality of the final product (Tchessalov et al., 2023). Small details, such as the stabilizer identity (Ohtake & Shalaev, 2013), the amount of vacuum, the vacuum strength, and the tightness of the temperature control (Samyuktha et al., 2025; Tchessalov et al., 2023), make the difference between a fragile sample and a robust one (Ohtake & Shalaev, 2013). When everything is tuned correctly, the process yields a porous, stable “cake” that dissolves quickly when reconstituted, preserving the peptide’s integrity (Kommineni et al., 2022).

In practice, lyophilized peptides make research more consistent (Kommineni et al., 2022; Samyuktha et al., 2025). They serve as reliable standards, remain stable in storage, and perform predictably in experiments (Kommineni et al., 2022; Zapadka et al., 2017). Their importance spans fields ranging from biochemistry and molecular biology to analytical science and materials research (Forbes & Krishnamurthy, 2025; Howl, 2008). By understanding the principles behind lyophilization and applying them with care, researchers can preserve peptides for years and count on them to deliver reproducible results when it matters most (Samyuktha et al., 2025; Tchessalov et al., 2023).

References:

Amartely, H., Iosub-Amir, A., & Friedler, A. (2014). Identifying protein-protein interaction sites using peptide arrays. Journal of Visualized Experiments: JoVE, 93, e52097. https://doi.org/10.3791/52097

Arora, S., Dash, S. K., Dhawan, D., Sahoo, P. K., Jindal, A., & Gugulothu, D. (2024). Freeze-drying revolution: Unleashing the potential of lyophilization in advancing drug delivery systems. Drug Delivery and Translational Research, 14(5), 1111–1153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13346-023-01477-7

Forbes, J., & Krishnamurthy, K. (2025). Biochemistry, Peptide. In StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK562260/

He, S., Ma, L., Zheng, Q., Wang, Z., Chen, W., Yu, Z., Yan, X., & Fan, K. (2024). Peptide nanozymes: An emerging direction for functional enzyme mimics. Bioactive Materials, 42, 284–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2024.08.033

Howl, J. (2008). Peptide Synthesis and Applications. Springer Science & Business Media.

Kommineni, N., Butreddy, A., Sainaga Jyothi, V. G. S., & Angsantikul, P. (2022). Freeze-drying for the preservation of immunoengineering products. iScience, 25(10), 105127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2022.105127

Mensch, C., Chintala, R., Nawrocki, D., Blue, J. T., & Bhambhani, A. (2021). Enabling Lyophilized Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccines Through Formulation Design and Excipient Selection Suitable for A Multivalent Adjuvanted Vaccine. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 110(1), 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xphs.2020.10.038

Ohtake, S., & Shalaev, E. (2013). Effect of water on the chemical stability of amorphous pharmaceuticals: I. small molecules. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 102(4), 1139–1154. https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.23440

Samyuktha, A. P., Ramesh, Y., Chandra, Y. P., Penabaka, V., Samyuktha, A. P., Ramesh, Y., Chandra, Y. P., & Penabaka, V. (2025). A review of lyophilization. GSC Biological and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 30(2), 007–021. https://doi.org/10.30574/gscbps.2025.30.2.0035

Tchessalov, S., Maglio, V., Kazarin, P., Alexeenko, A., Bhatnagar, B., Sahni, E., & Shalaev, E. (2023). Practical Advice on Scientific Design of Freeze-Drying Process: 2023 Update. Pharmaceutical Research, 40(10), 2433–2455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-023-03607-9

Wang, L., Wang, N., Zhang, W., Cheng, X., Yan, Z., Shao, G., Wang, X., Wang, R., & Fu, C. (2022). Therapeutic peptides: Current applications and future directions. Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy, 7(1), 48. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-022-00904-4

Zapadka, K. L., Becher, F. J., Gomes dos Santos, A. L., & Jackson, S. E. (2017). Factors affecting the physical stability (aggregation) of peptide therapeutics. Interface Focus, 7(6), 20170030. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2017.0030